---
title: "5.9.2 Cluster Coordination Architecture Review"
slug: "592-cluster-coordination-architecture-review"
updated: 2024-03-11T07:19:37Z
published: 2024-03-11T07:19:37Z
canonical: "handbook.fscluster.org/592-cluster-coordination-architecture-review"
---

> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://handbook.fscluster.org/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# 5.9.2 Cluster Coordination Architecture Review

The Cluster Coordination Architecture Review (CCAR) is usually initiated **by the HC/HCT**, **led by external reviewers** *(a* [*Peer-to-Peer team*](https://www.deliveraidbetter.org/)) and **facilitated by** **OCHA**. It assesses whether **cluster coordination structures continue to be appropriate** in the light of changes in the humanitarian context. The CCAR determines whether cluster coordination structures should: **1)** continue as they are **2)** be scaled up, **3)** be streamlined (reduced), or, **4)** transition to longer-term structures, with a plan and benchmarks for deactivation ([*see 3.8 on the link with cluster transition and deactivation planning*](/cc/docs/38-cluster-transition-and-deactivation)).

**Clusters are timebound** and, when possible, should transition from emergency to long-term coordination structures that are led or supported by national authorities ([IASC](https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/cluster_coordination_reference_module_2015_final.pdf), 2015).

CCARs may be informed by CCPM results, but decisions on whether a cluster remains "fit for purpose" must be based on an analysis of changes in the humanitarian context and national coordination capacity. OCHA assists RC/HCs in ensuring that reviews at country level are carried out in a timely manner, with inputs from CLAs, Coordinators, cluster partners and national counterparts – while Global Clusters are kept informed.

**What is the FSC Coordinator’s role?**

**Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring:** ***The Coordinator should consider the following:***

- After the gFSC launches the process at the global level, it is the responsibility of the Coordinator to share the survey at the country level and to complete the Cluster Coordinator survey. The CCPM should only be shared with cluster/sector active partners and any additional partners that are deemed relevant to the coordination structure. The FSC should send reminders if needed (in order to reach at least 50% participation of active members).
- Review the results with the CLA and SAG.
- Organise a validation workshop which includes a workplan.
- Share the final report to the FSC members

**Guidance****:** See more on the CCPM process on the [FSC website](http://fscluster.org/page/country-cluster-performance-monitoring). Contact the GST (e.g. geographical focal point, CCPM focal point) for details.

**Cluster Coordination Architecture Review:** FAO and WFP will participate in periodic reviews, with the FSC Coordinator actively supporting and contributing to this process throughout ([*see also 9.8 on operational peer reviews*](/cc/docs/98-operational-peer-reviews-and-inter-agency-humanitarian-evaluations)).

**Guidance****:** See the [Reference Module for Cluster Coordination at Country Level](https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/iasc-transformative-agenda/iasc-reference-module-cluster-coordination-country-level-revised-2015) (IASC, 2015) pp. 35 and 39-40.

Cluster Coordination Architecture Review

Humanitarian Country Team

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring

Resident Coordinator / Humanitarian Coordinator

Cluster Lead Agencies

Global Food Security Cluster

Food Security Cluster

Strategic Advisory Group

Global Support Team (gFSC)

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation

World Food Programme

Inter-Agency Standing Committee